We The People

We The People

Thursday, February 22, 2018

Why did Mueller's indictments skip over the most obvious and pertinent statute that was violated?

Why did Mueller's indictments skip over the most obvious and pertinent statute that was violated?:

Image result for flickr commons images Robert Mueller"Robert Mueller’s indictments announced Friday are most notable for what Sherlock Holmes famously called “The dog that didn’t bark.” There was a clear, obvious, and pertinent statute that could have been applied to the alleged crimes but wasn’t.  Fortunately, the blogosphere has our own Sherlock Holmes on the case, Powerline’s John Hinderaker, who noticed the charge that was not made:"


No comments:

Post a Comment