We The People
Friday, June 29, 2018
Maxine Waters advances a liberal strategy with her call for mob action - Washington Times
Maxine Waters advances a liberal strategy with her call for mob action - Washington Times:
There was a time when liberals stood against the use of intimidation, harassment and violence against political opponents. The gay, black and women’s civil rights movements were about ending the fascist technique of frightening and intimidating people into retreat and silence. Now it appears George Orwell’s “Animal Farm” is more relevant than ever.
Dr. Robert Epstein: Six Reasons Mark Zuckerberg Should Quit Facebook Right Now | Breitbart
Epstein also warned that the longer Facebook continues to operate in it’s current state, the higher the chance is that the company will eventually fail:
Thursday, June 28, 2018
Up next: 1970s-style bombings, warns progressive
Up next: 1970s-style bombings, warns progressive:
A writer for the popular progressive news website Splinter is warning supporters of President Trump that if they have a problem with the heckling of administration officials in public places, they haven’t seen anything yet.
“Do you think that being asked to leave a restaurant, or having your meal interrupted, or being called by the public is bad? My fascism-enabling friends, this is only the beginning,”
“Do you think that being asked to leave a restaurant, or having your meal interrupted, or being called by the public is bad? My fascism-enabling friends, this is only the beginning,”
In a Win for Free Speech, Supreme Court Says California Can’t Force Pro-Life Centers to Promote Abortion | The Heritage Foundation
In a Win for Free Speech, Supreme Court Says California Can’t Force Pro-Life Centers to Promote Abortion | The Heritage Foundation:

The Court rightly held that the California law in question, the Reproductive FACT Act, “likely violates the First Amendment” and “unduly burdens protected speech.”
In other words, California is entitled to take a position on abortion, but it cannot force others to agree with and speak its message.
The Court rightly held that the California law in question, the Reproductive FACT Act, “likely violates the First Amendment” and “unduly burdens protected speech.”
In other words, California is entitled to take a position on abortion, but it cannot force others to agree with and speak its message.
Border Patrol Sets Up Shop In New England – Gets Unbelievable Results In Only 11 Hours | The Daily Caller
Border Patrol Sets Up Shop In New England – Gets Unbelievable Results In Only 11 Hours | The Daily Caller:
The checkpoints are “a means of preventing smuggling organizations from exploiting existing transportation systems to travel to the interior of the United States,” the CBP said in a statement.
The Supreme Court has affirmed that the CBP can conduct immigration checks that are a “reasonable distance” of 100 air miles from U.S. borders and coastlines. Officers also have the ability to ask about their citizenship status irrespective of any suspicion.
The Supreme Court has affirmed that the CBP can conduct immigration checks that are a “reasonable distance” of 100 air miles from U.S. borders and coastlines. Officers also have the ability to ask about their citizenship status irrespective of any suspicion.
Judicial Watch files House ethics complaint against Maxine Waters for 'inciting violence' - Washington Times
Judicial Watch files House ethics complaint against Maxine Waters for 'inciting violence' - Washington Times:
Judicial Watch filed Monday an ethics complaint against Rep. Maxine Waters for “inciting violence and assaults on the Trump Cabinet,” according to Tom Fitton, president of the watchdog organization.
The group sent a hand-delivered letter to the chairman and co-chairman of the House Office of Congressional Ethics calling for an investigation into whether the California Democrat violated House ethics rules by encouraging violence against Trump Cabinet members.
The group sent a hand-delivered letter to the chairman and co-chairman of the House Office of Congressional Ethics calling for an investigation into whether the California Democrat violated House ethics rules by encouraging violence against Trump Cabinet members.
Wednesday, June 27, 2018
Trail of Deceit
By
Tammy Derouin
The
downright nastiness which has infected our country, over the past
decade, is difficult to comprehend. But then again, we had an
administration which targeted the political opposition and weaponized
government departments to further its agenda. When they failed to
retain control, when their attempts to continue their trail of deceit
failed, they had to double down. The lack of civility towards those
who do not fall in lock step with the liberal agenda of enslavement
is extremely disturbing and very dangerous.
The
Left uses hatred as a weapon to promote their political agenda. I'd
say it's unbelievable but in today's world, certain behavior has
become common, acceptable, and quite sadly, expected. Liberals can
spew vulgar remarks and make outlandish statements regarding the
safety and well-being of others, or any other kind of distasteful
comments with little to no concern about consequences. Heck, you
stand a good chance of being rewarded and cheered on by other
like-minded individuals for participating in such wretched behavior.
Gone
are the days when true shame would follow such irresponsible
outbursts. Sometimes it makes me wonder just how many of these
tirades are planned. I don't care if people are on opposite sides of
an issue. Calling or hoping for harm to come to individuals or to
nudge others to join in on attempts to invade the personal lives of
those with whom they disagree, and their children, is beyond
irresponsible. It's downright evil. Any apology just comes across as
empty words, as if it's part of the stunt. What's in an apology these
days anyway? It seems more scripted than heartfelt. It brings
attention right back to the deed and it gives the offending
individual even more publicity. If they decide to take back the
apology they can get a few more miles out of their cause by prompting
the audience to applaud.
Hollywood
types who hunger for the spot light seem to have found a way to keep
their names alive as they try to claim just a little more fame, or
maybe it's notoriety. They are jumping on the left-wing political
bandwagon. I wonder if they really understand the script. Do they
understand the harm they are causing to our freedom? Maybe they think
that their new found activism will somehow reignite their career.
The
Hollywood elites and their has-been communities, nonetheless, are
still located in the land of make believe. They are hired
entertainers, paid to entertain. I'm not sure if they understand
where the fake studio ends and reality begins. Most of their movies
and shows are disappointing disaster. Their attempts to remain
relevant only make them look desperate and ignorant.
Unfortunately,
their new found role is also very dangerous. It is harmful to our
free society. I do not, however, want them to be silenced. Unlike
many on the Left who wish to silence those who do not think and
believe as they do, freedom of speech and the right to live as you
believe is a God-given right. When individuals call for harm and
destructive deeds, such individuals must be investigated and held
accountable.
We
know such vicious behavior toward Obama or anyone in his family and
administration would not have been tolerated. There would have been
an outcry and such behavior would have been investigated, as it
should, because no one is supposed to be above the law. We also know
that attempting to silence anyone on the Left would have been turned
into a federal crime. If we believe in equal justice, shouldn't the
same be true regardless of who holds office?
I
came across an article this past week which is extremely concerning.
The ACLU is apparently still claiming to defend freedom of speech,
but has added that it will only commit to defend speech if the views
expressed align with the values and goals of the ACLU. Now isn't
that interesting and scary? Do we want to be a free society? Or,
would we prefer to be told what we should believe and how we should
think, speak and act?
Dictators
and oppressive governments only support free speech if the speech is
in their favor. Do we value differing opinions and the right to
express free thought? If not, we do not value freedom of speech. We
are entering a very dangerous time. When it becomes acceptable to
attack and restrict the rights of others simply because they do not
hold the same belief, we are no longer the land of the free.
“But
a Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be
restored. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever.”
John
Adams
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)