Under
Siege
By
Tammy Derouin
After
eight long years of neglect, the security of the American people and
the homeland are once again the focus of the White House. The United
States was under siege by an administration which put the feelings
and false rights of illegal aliens and our enemies above the
citizens. We witnessed, in disbelief, as individuals were being
ushered into our land without questions or background checks. It
makes you wonder about long term consequences for such criminal
actions.
Every
president takes an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the U.S.
Constitution. How does one president get away with not upholding the
law while his successor is demonized for doing his sworn duty? Why
are threats of impeachment and calls for the assassination of
President Trump being glorified? Clearly, the Democratic Party, the
party which claims to be a party of tolerance, would not condone such
behavior if Obama or Clinton were the target of such vicious, vile
acts.
We
now have an administration which wants to uphold the law. The
President of the United States enacted an executive order to enforce
national security. Let's think about the brilliance of the executive
order. It puts a temporary hold on individuals traveling to the U.S.
who are departing from some of the most pro-terrorist/anti-American
countries in the world. Some would say it doesn't go far enough, me
included, but it's a start. The order would prevent terrorists or
potential terrorists from entering the United States.
Once
an individual is properly vetted, they would be allowed to enter. Of
course, the individual would be expected to live and abide by the
rules and laws of the United States. If, at any time, they abuse the
privilege of being a guest in our country, consequences for unlawful
behavior should be enforced.
Any
American who truly values our freedoms, our history, and our way of
life, should not be shocked or offended when laws and orders are put
into place to protect the citizens and the homeland. To do anything
less would be negligent. In the case of the President of the United
States, he would be violating his constitutional duty if he didn't
protect our borders. If he fails to live up to his sworn duty, he
would be rightfully subjected to Constitutional consequences.
Oddly,
many have decided to call President Trump's willingness to uphold the
law and to fulfill his rightfully duty as president, a radical move.
Some have the audacity to claim, including the 9th
District Court of Appeals, his actions as President are
unconstitutional.
It is the duty of the Executive Branch to up hold the law and to work
within the law to protect the American people and our borders.
If
a president failed to follow the law or protect the United States,
wouldn't that make him negligent? If lack of adequate screening or
protection, after an attack by our enemy, could be traced back to the
White House, wouldn't it make sense for the president to face, at the
very least, questions about his lack of care; his inability to
protect the people and the homeland?
The
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) grants the Executive the power
to limit or deny individuals into our country. The INA states,
“individual aliens outside the United States are 'inadmissible' –
or barred from admission to the country – on health, criminal,
security, and other grounds set forth in the INA.” But it doesn't
stop there: “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any
aliens or of any class of aliens into the Untied States would be
detrimental to the interest of the United States, he may by
proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend
the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or
nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he
may deem to be appropriate.”
President
Trump is working within the law. Not only did Obama use the very
same authority, he used it 19 times during his his term in office;
more than Reagan, Bush, Clinton, G.W. Bush, combined. Those who are
protesting and making judicial judgments, need to take a closer look
at the facts. Why would you want to admit individuals who wish to
destroy our country?
When
lies are used to promote hate by those who seek or hold power, we
only need to look back at history to see a deadly outcome. The rise
of Hitler, the Nazi Party and the death of millions of Jews should
serve as a wake up call. Lies produces hate. Hate + violence =
death.
“The
very first essential for success is a perpetually constant and
regular employment of violence.”
No comments:
Post a Comment